WorkgroupShare for Outlook - Comments for WorkgroupShare for Outlook

Home	Saturday, 9/6/2008

Software
• Network Administrator
• Network Security
• Exchange Server
• ISA Server
• Terminal Services
• Internet Server
• Comm. & collaboration
• Microsoft server add-on
• Other network Software

• Full listing

Other
• Links
• Submit your product
• Advertise here
•

Featured Product

TechGenix Sites

ISAserver.org: The No.1 ISA Server 2000 & 2004 resource site.
MSExchange.org: The leading Microsoft Exchange Server 2003 / 2000 / 5.5 resource site.
WindowSecurity.com: Security resource for IT administrators.
WindowsNetworking.com: Windows server & networking resource site.
MSTerminalServices.org: A leading Microsoft Terminal Services and Citrix resource site.

ServerFiles.com is a server software & hardware directory for Network administrators & IT professionals, listing networking & server software for Windows 2003, Windows 2000, NT and Linux; and now also listing networking hardware solutions focused on server based computing.

~ Misc. communications & collaborations

WorkgroupShare for Outlook	Rating:			(7 votes) - Vote
Last Updated: September 23, 2003

Lets you share Outlook information, such as contacts and calendars, without needing Microsoft Exchange. Provides full administrative control over user access rights.

Share Outlook Data - Share contacts, calendars and tasks among selected members of staff. Public Folders - Create public calendar, contact and task folders that may be shared among selected members of staff. Full Access Control - Define precisely the access that members of staff have to specific shared folders. Administrator program - Lets you define users, groups, public folders and access rights.

:: Platform ::	Windows
:: Product URL ::	click here
:: Screenshot ::	click here
:: Price ::	$149

:: Company ::	Softalk Ltd - All Prods
:: Company URL ::	www.softalk.ws
:: Email ::	stb@softalk.ws

Showing comments 1-3 of 3

Comments for WorkgroupShare for Outlook:

"Disappointed with WorkgroupShare" - Don [January 8, 2004] Product Rating: 1/5
After unsuccessfully attempting to install WorkgroupShare 1.3 we tried to avail ourselves of the 30 day trial period and get our money back. To date Softalk has yet to respond to any of our inquiries. The product is poorly documented and supported. There is no guarantee that it will work or even install successfully despite Softalks assurances of the efficacy of their revisions. I am not incline to every purchase another product of any kind from Softalk.

"WorkgroupShare" - Les Vaughn [October 13, 2003] Product Rating: 4/5
Am 4 days into the trial version of this program and it appears it is the perferct answer to my small Win98SE peer-to-peer within my office. Have had to be persistent in the installation as the documentation is not very clear in some areas but we seem to be up/running and sharing information at this point.

Have had one small problem with an ever-increasing SQL.LOG file and have emailed support to see what the options are with it. Otherwise, looks like I will be purchasing the program within the next few weeks....

Les

"First impressions" - Matt Eberly [September 29, 2003]
I installed WorkGroupShare this morning after stumbling across it last night - its very small
(<3mb), easy to install and rather simple to admin.

I added a few clients and a shared public calendar and it worked very well - I was really
impressed. I've been dragging my feet not wishing to install Exchange and was all set to do so
till I found this late last night.

So far, the organization where I installed it is very happy with the performance and ease of use.
We are both hoping for some additional features. I realize this is 1.0 RC4 - but somethings
mentioned on their
web site are missing (No Access control and Web-Clients)

Documentation is rather spotty but I just emailed support so I hope they respond in a timely
manner.

matt

Showing comments 1-3 of 3

Post your own comments/reviews/experiences with WorkgroupShare for Outlook to this page:

Disclaimer: The views and opinions of visitors published on ServerFiles.com do not necessarily state or reflect the opinion of ServerFiles.com.